Key result
TEE provides more detailed atrial morphology than precordial imaging, detecting ~110% more PFOs.
Why the study?
The advantages of transoesophageal echocardiography over precordial echocardiography for evaluating atrial morphology in children with congenital heart disease were unclear.
Does transoesophageal echocardiography improve the evaluation of atrial morphology compared to precordial echocardiography in children with congenital heart disease?
Observational (n=86)
Does transoesophageal echocardiography improve the evaluation of atrial morphology compared to precordial echocardiography in children with congenital heart disease?
Transoesophageal echocardiography provides a more detailed and accurate evaluation of atrial morphology and septal defects than precordial imaging in children with congenital heart disease.
May enhance atrial septal defect detection in pediatric congenital heart disease; leaves open whether transoesophageal echocardiography changes management or outcomes.
In a prospective study, atrial morphology was evaluated by both transoesophageal and precordial echocardiography in 86 unoperated children with congenital heart disease (age range = 0.2 to 14.8 years, mean = 3.8 years) to determine what advantages, if any, might be inherent in the transoesophageal approach. The information derived from both ultrasound approaches was correlated and compared to information obtained during subsequent cardiac catheterization (78 patients) and, or, surgical inspection (53 patients). Atrial appendage morphology and hence atrial situs was determined by transoesophageal echocardiography in every case (82 solitus, two right atrial isomerism, two left atrial isomerism). In addition, the transoesophageal approach indicated left juxtaposition in four patients, compared to only one by precordial examination. Probe patency of the foramen ovale was correctly predicted in 21 patients by transoesophageal imaging, but in only 10 by precordial imaging. In two children significant secundum defects, undetected by the precordial route, were identified. Multiple atrial septal defects were correctly defined in four patients by transoesophageal study but in only one by precordial study. Sinus venosus defects were documented in four by the transoesophageal approach, but in only one by the precordial. Primum defects were equally well documented (nine patients) by either technique, but the associated valve leaflet morphology was better documented by transoesophageal study in 5/9. A subtotal cor triatriatum was diagnosed in one child only by transoesophageal investigation. Transoesophageal echocardiography allows a much more detailed evaluation of atrial morphology than precordial imaging even in infants. It provides direct diagnosis of atrial situs, detection of juxtaposed atrial appendages and improved demonstration or definitive exclusion of atrial septal defects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tuccillo et al. (1992) conducted an observational in congenital heart disease (n=86). Transoesophageal echocardiography vs. Precordial echocardiography was evaluated on Evaluation of atrial morphology. Transoesophageal echocardiography provided more detailed evaluation of atrial morphology than precordial imaging, detecting patent foramen ovale in 21 vs 10 patients and multiple ASDs in 4 vs 1.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: