Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Detailed mineralogical and textural studies, combined with sequential X-ray diffraction and geochemical modeling, helped to solve the “copper pitch/wad” enigma in the Exótica deposit located downstream of the Chuquicamata porphyry copper deposit. Copper pitch and copper wad are essentially chrysocolla with co-precipitated Mn oxides, mainly birnessite, as well as pseudo-amorphous Mn oxide/oxyhydroxides. Linking the mineralogical, geochemical, and textural evidences with the geological, tectonic, and climatic evolution of the Chuquicamata–Calama area, a four-step genetic model for the evolution of the Exótica deposit is presented: (A) formation of a mature supergene enrichment profile at Chuquicamata (~ 30–25 Ma to ~ 15 Ma) during an erosion-dominated regime (∼900 m of erosion) which was accompanied by acidic (pH ∼2–4) Cu-Mn-Si-dominated rock drainage (ARD) with fluid flow southwards through the Exótica valley towards the Calama Basin, resulting in a strongly kaolinized and chrysocolla/copper wad-impregnated bedrock of the Exótica deposit; (B) deposition of the Fortuna gravels in the Exótica valley (starting ∼19 Ma) intercepted the Cu-Mn-Si-dominated ARD, triggering the main chrysocolla, copper pitch/wad mineralization as syn-sedimentary mineralization by chiefly surficial flow in strongly altered gravels; (C) tectonic freezing and onset of hyper-aridity (∼15–11 Ma) exposed the enriched chalcocite blanket of Chuquicamata to oxidation, resulting in acidic (pH ~ 2–4) and Cu-Si-dominated solutions with less Mn. These solutions percolated in a slightly more reducing groundwater flow path and mineralized relatively unaltered gravels with pure chrysocolla; and (D) ingression of confined chloride-rich groundwater in the upper oxidation zone of Chuquicamata, most likely between 6 and 3 Ma, is responsible for the atacamite/brochantite mineralization (pH ~ 5.5–7) of mainly unaltered gravels in the northern and central part of the Exótica deposit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dold et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: