Key result
Post-exercise LV and LA measurements fail to reflect heart function at maximal exercise.
Why the study?
The validity of post-exercise measurements of left ventricular and atrial dimensions or shortening fraction to describe heart function at maximal exercise was uncertain.
Are post-exercise measurements of left ventricular and atrial dimensions valid to describe heart function at maximal exercise in healthy young subjects?
Cross-Sectional (n=31)
Are post-exercise measurements of left ventricular and atrial dimensions valid to describe heart function at maximal exercise in healthy young subjects?
Echocardiographic measurements taken immediately post-exercise do not accurately reflect cardiac dimensions and function at maximal exercise due to rapid changes in ventricular volumes.
Clinicians should not use immediate post-exercise echo to infer maximal cardiac function; leaves open the validity of such measures in exercise physiology research.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in the left atrial (LAD), total ventricular end-diastolic (TEDD), end-systolic diameters (TESD), and left ventricular shortening fraction (SF) compared with heart rate (HR) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) during exercise and recovery. METHODS: Healthy young male (N = 15) and female (N = 16) subjects performed an incremental cycle ergometer test in upright position, and three phases of energy supply were defined by means of blood lactate concentration (LA) and respiratory gas exchange variables (I: aerobic; II: aerobic-anaerobic transition; III: anaerobic). Subjects were required to rest their arms on a steering bar and to lean their upper body forward; two dimensional (2-D) echocardiograms were obtained over the left parasternal area at rest (R), at the end of each phase, immediately within 15 s post, and 6 min after exercise (6 min). By using VINGMED's "Anatomical M-Mode," it was possible to extract M-Mode Sweeps from stored 2-D-Loops and perform the M-Mode measurement. RESULTS: In contrast to the significant decrease in TEDD and TESD from III to 15 s up to resting values and the significant increase in SF from III to 15 s, the moderate decrease in HR immediately post exercise (15 s) was not significant. The SBP showed a significantly decrease from III to 15 s; in contrast to TEDD, TESD, and SF, the values at 15 s were comparable with the values at II. For LAD, significant increase during exercise and a decrease during recovery were observed. Sex-specific differences of changes in measured variables could not be found. CONCLUSION: We concluded that post exercise measurement of left ventricular and atrial dimensions or SF were not valid to describe heart function at maximal exercise although immediately post exercise HR was near maximal level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pokan et al. (2000) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=31). Incremental cycle ergometer test vs. Rest was evaluated on Differences in left atrial, total ventricular end-diastolic, end-systolic diameters, and left ventricular shortening fraction during exercise and recovery. Post-exercise measurements of left ventricular and atrial dimensions or shortening fraction are not valid to describe heart function at maximal exercise.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: