Key result
Hematogenous MRSA spread from infected AV grafts causes transvenous pacemaker lead infections in two hemodialysis patients.
Why the study?
Infection of transvenous pacemaker devices due to hematogenous spread from infected arteriovenous grafts in chronic hemodialysis patients is not well characterized.
Case Report (n=2)
Hematogenous spread of infection from arteriovenous grafts can infect transvenous pacemakers, suggesting epicardial pacemakers may be a safer long-term option for hemodialysis patients.
Raises caution for transvenous pacemaker infection risk from AV grafts in hemodialysis; leaves open whether epicardial devices reduce this complication.
Pacemaker (PM), implantable cardioverter defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices also provide support to chronic hemodialysis patients with cardiac rhythm abnormalities. However, these devices can get infected. In general, device infection is either primary or metastatic spread from a distant source. Arteriovenous grafts are commonly used to provide dialysis therapy. Compared to a fistula an arteriovenous graft runs a higher risk of infection. In this analysis, we report 2 chronic hemodialysis patients who have been successfully receiving dialysis through an arteriovenous graft for approximately 2 years. Both had had a PM device for about the same duration. Access infection necessitated surgical removal of the arteriovenous graft in these patients. However, due to bacteremia (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcal aureus (MRSA)), infection spread to involve the transvenous PM leads in both patients. In 1 patient the infection also involved the PM pocket. Lead and wound culture confirmed MRSA in both patients. PM device and leads were removed in both patients. After the resolution of bacteremia, both patients received an epicardial pacemaker. None of the patients had valvular endocarditis. While dialysis was provided with a catheter, an arteriovenous fistula was planned. In conclusion, contamination of the transvenous PM device can occur due to hematogenous spread of infection from an infected arteriovenous graft. Epicardial instead of a transvenous PM might be the better option for such patients to provide long-term cardiac rhythm support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carrillo et al. (2010) conducted a case report in Arteriovenous graft infection with metastatic spread to transvenous pacemaker (n=2). Arteriovenous graft infection was evaluated on Transvenous pacemaker infection. Hematogenous spread of MRSA from an infected arteriovenous graft caused transvenous pacemaker lead infection in 2 chronic hemodialysis patients, necessitating device removal.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: