DNA binding and metabolism patterns of 3H-labeled aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and its phase I metabolites, aflatoxicol (AFL), aflatoxin M1 (AFM1), and aflatoxicol-M1 (AFL-M1), were compared in freshly prepared rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) hepatocytes. Aflatoxins were incubated with hepatocytes for periods up to 1 h, cellular DNA was isolated and specific activities determined by scintillation counting and Burton analysis. Data for (pmol bound aflatoxin/micrograms DNA)/(mumol dose) versus time fit a linear function (P less than 0.002) passing nearly through the origin for each aflatoxin. DNA binding at 1 h relative to AFB1 was: AFL, 0.53 +/- 0.07; AFM1, 0.81 +/- 0.20 AFL-M1, 0.83 +/- 0.24. Statistical analysis indicated that binding of AFL, AFM1 and AFL-M1 were significantly less than that of AFB1. HPLC analysis of the cellular supernatants indicated that the major metabolites were AFL, AFB1, AFL-M1, and AFM1 from AFB1, AFL, AFM1 and AFL-M1 substrates, respectively. Small quantities of hydroxylated metabolites and glucuronides also were detected in some of the incubations. The time-course data suggested that initial formation of major metabolites was rapid and that, by 20-30 min, net changes in metabolite levels decreased or approached zero. Because the four compounds possess a 8,9-double bond, DNA binding could be due to activation of the parent substrates as well as of their phase I metabolites. Based on current mutagenicity data and limited carcinogenicity studies, AFM1 and AFL-M1 have binding levels which are higher than expected compared to AFB1 and AFL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loveland et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: