Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
–Biomarker measurements can be relatively easy and quick to obtain and are useful to investigate whether a compound works as intended on a mechanistic, pharmacological level. In some situations, it is realistic to assume that patients, whose post-baseline biomarker levels indicate that they do not sufficiently respond to the drug, are also unlikely to respond on clinically relevant long-term outcomes (such as time-to-event). However, the determination of the treatment effect in the subgroup of patients that would be biomarker responders, if given treatment, is not straightforward in a parallel groups trial: it is unclear which patients on placebo would have responded had they been given the treatment, so that naive comparisons between treatment and placebo will not estimate the treatment effect of interest. The purpose of this article is to investigate assumptions necessary to obtain causal conclusions in such a setting, using the formalism and existing strategies from causal inference. Three approaches for estimation of subgroup effects will be developed and illustrated using simulations and a case-study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bornkamp et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: