Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mobile applications increasingly support critical services, making high-quality user experience (UX) essential. Nevertheless, scalable UX evaluation remains challenging because it relies on expert judgment and heterogeneous evidence. This study introduces mUXSmellDetection, a catalog-driven, multi-modal framework for automated UX smell detection in Java-based Android applications. A Mobile UX Smells Catalog was developed, comprising 40 standardized UX smells with explicit detection rules and evidence requirements. The framework integrates runtime interaction logs collected through hybrid in-app and system-level logging, GUI screenshots, and Java AST-based code metadata, which are transformed into structured prompts for large language models (LLMs). The approach was evaluated on ten real-world Android applications using GPT-4o, GPT-5, and GPT-5 Thinking. Detection results were compared to an expert baseline established by three UX experts. GPT-5 achieved the highest overall performance, with 94.29% Precision, 89.19% Recall, and 91.67% F1-score. These findings indicate that multi-modal evidence enables scalable and practical automated UX smell detection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al‐Shammare et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: