This paper provides a comparison of the extraction of U(VI) and Am(III) from 3 M HNO3 by Amberlite XAD‐4 and XAD‐7 resins loaded with octyl(phenyl)‐N,N‐diisobutylcarbamoylmethylphosphine oxide (OΦCMPO). The paper also compares the breakthrough behavior during the sorption of Nd(III) and U(VI) from 3 M HNO3 by extraction chromatography using these resins as support material with OΦCMPO as the stationary phase. The data indicate that XAD‐7 is a better support material for extraction chromatographic applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suresh et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: