Care of the patient with multiple sclerosis (MS) is becoming increasingly complex, with new symptomatic therapies (e.g., dalfampridine), enhanced use of disease-modifying therapies that are potentially both more efficacious and more risky (e.g., natalizumab, rituximab) than “standard” immunomodulators, the advent of oral disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) (e.g., fingolimod, cladribine, teriflunomide, laquinimod), and the possibility of regenerative or reparative therapies (e.g., stem cells, neuroprogenitor cells, antibodies to leucine-rich repeat and immunoglobulin (Ig) domain containing NOGO receptor interacting protein-1, i.e., anti-LINGO therapies). All of this is happening in the context of a suggestion that MS may fundamentally result from aberrant venous flow, so-called chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI), and a similarly fundamental pathologic discussion of the relationship between inflammation and degeneration over time in patients with MS. Noting the difficulty of choosing among many options, we present discussions of 5 new topics relevant to patients with MS and their neurologists in 2010.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miravalle et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: