Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: In a previous study by the Gynecologic Oncology Group only modest activity was seen with bolus etoposide in leiomyosarcoma of the uterus (an 11% response rate). To exploit the schedule dependency of etoposide, which favors longer exposure, a Phase II trial of prolonged oral etoposide was conducted in this tumor. METHODS: Eligibility included leiomyosarcoma of the uterus, measurable disease, one prior chemotherapy regimen which did not include etoposide, WBC >/= 3000/microliter, platelet count >/=100, 000/microliter, serum creatinine </=2 mg%, and adequate hepatic function. The starting etoposide dose was 50 mg/m2/day (30-40 mg/m2/day for prior radiotherapy) as a single dose for 21 days, every 28 days. Based on toxicity, a dose escalation to a maximum etoposide dose of 60 mg/m2/day was prescribed. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were entered on this study; 34 were evaluable for toxicity and 29 were evaluable for response. A median of 2 courses were given (range 1-14). Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 20.6% and grade 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 5.8%. One patient developed acute myeloid leukemia 10 months after completing 7 cycles of therapy. Among the patients evaluable for response, 27 had received prior chemotherapy and 6 had received prior radiation therapy. Two partial responses (6.9%) were observed. CONCLUSION: This regimen has minimal activity as second-line chemotherapy in leiomyosarcoma of the uterus. No benefit to the chronic oral schedule is evident.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blessing et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: