Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: Adrenal incidentalomas have been increasingly diagnosed, thanks to advances in medical imaging and its growing use in the general population. They represent a diagnostic challenge due to their heterogeneous nature and malignant potential. This work illustrates the importance of optimal and appropriate management and, above all, of limiting exploration and morphological follow-up when the mass is initially benign in appearance. Patients and Methods: In a retrospective study spanning 12 years and including a total of 25 patients, all had an adrenal mass discovered incidentally. Results: In our study, adrenal incidentalomas had a prevalence of 11.27%, with a mean age of 54.9 years, and were mainly discovered incidentally during abdominal imaging. Clinical, hormonal and radiological evaluation, dominated by the use of a CT scan in 80% of cases, identified mostly non-functional adenomas in 64% of cases, pheochromocytoma, Conn’s adenoma, MACS in equal proportions, with appropriate management based on risk of malignancy or hormonal activity. Ethical Considerations: in accordance with the regulation in force, informed consent, written and verbal, was provided by the patients concerned by the study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Riznat et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: