Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hydraulic conductivity (K) fields are used to parameterize groundwater flow and transport models. Numerical simulations require a detailed representation of the K field, synthesized to interpolate between available data. Several recent studies introduced high‐resolution K data (HRK) at the Macro Dispersion Experiment (MADE) site, and used ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) to delineate the main structural features of the aquifer. This paper describes a statistical analysis of these data, and the implications for K field modeling in alluvial aquifers. Two striking observations have emerged from this analysis. The first is that a simple fractional difference filter can have a profound effect on data histograms, organizing non‐Gaussian ln K data into a coherent distribution. The second is that using GPR facies allows us to reproduce the significantly non‐Gaussian shape seen in real HRK data profiles, using a simulated Gaussian ln K field in each facies. This illuminates a current controversy in the literature, between those who favor Gaussian ln K models, and those who observe non‐Gaussian ln K fields. Both camps are correct, but at different scales.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meerschaert et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: