Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dissection of signal transduction pathways has been advanced by classic genetic approaches including targeted gene deletion and siRNA-based inhibition of gene product synthesis. Chemical genetics is a biochemical approach to develop small peptide-mimetic ligands to alter, post-translationally, how an enzyme functions. DAPK-1 was used as a model enzyme to develop selective peptide ligands that modulate its specific activity. The tumor modifier p21 has the most highly conserved elements of a DAPK consensus substrate, including a basic core followed by a hydrophobic core. Therefore, the p21 protein was synthesized in overlapping fragments to acquire a panel of peptide ligands for testing in DAPK binding and phosphorylation assays. Three distinct p21 derived peptide fragments were found to bind to DAPK; however, these had no stimulatory effect on its activity toward in vivo substrates, p21 and MLC. The p21 peptide ligands did, however, strikingly stimulate DAPK activity toward p53, a substrate that shows conservation in the hydrophobic part of its DAPK-1 consensus site. DAPK-1 stimulatory peptides attenuate tryptic cleavage of DAPK-1, suggesting that ligand binding can alter DAPK-1 conformation and lock the enzyme onto its substrate. We, therefore, generated an artificial p53, containing arginine residues N-terminal to the phospho-acceptor site, creating a better DAPK-1 peptide consensus and demonstrated that the Km for p531-66[ET-->RR] and ATP is elevated. The full-length p53E17T18-->R17R18 also functioned as a better Ser20 kinase substrate in vivo. These data suggest that DAPK-1 binding ligands can be generated to elevate its specific activity toward weak substrates and provide an approach to develop genetic assays to alter DAPK-1-specific activity in vivo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fraser et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: