Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Six growth-related variables were measured or calculated to evaluate two feeding methods for reducing the growth of the steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss). The two feeding methods were reduced continuous daily feeding and intermittent feeding. After eight 14-d growth periods, there were no significant treatment-related differences in size variation and size distribution within populations of fish in either treatment. Rates of growth among all groups – continuously fed and intermittently fed – were comparable, as were feed conversions. There were no apparent adverse effects, such as fin erosion, attributable to either treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klontz et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: