Key result
Individualized calculation yields ~31% higher temporal summation magnitude than the mean group approach.
Why the study?
Methodological variations between studies make it difficult to reach a consensus on how temporal summation should be applied and calculated using tonic noxious stimulation.
Cross-Sectional (n=154)
Absolute Event Rate: 41% vs 31.4%
p-value: p=<0.001
An individualized calculation method for temporal summation better reflects individual magnitudes compared to a mean group approach.
BACKGROUND: A model for measuring temporal summation (TS) by tonic noxious stimulation was recently proposed. However, methodological variations between studies make it difficult to reach a consensus regarding the way TS should be applied and calculated. The present study aimed to present a calculation method of TS magnitude produced by a tonic heat model in a large cohort of healthy subjects. METHODS: Noxious heat stimulation (46.5°C/2 minutes) was applied to the forearm of 154 subjects who continuously rated pain intensity using a computerized visual analog scale. TS was calculated by "mean group" and "individual" approaches. RESULTS: A "typical" pattern of pain response, characterized by a peak pain followed by a decrease in intensity to a nadir and subsequently a progressive increase in pain scores, was exhibited by 86.4% of the subjects. Using the "mean group" and "individual" calculation approaches, the mean ± standard deviation magnitudes of TS were 31.4±27.5 and 41.0±26.0, respectively (P<0.001). Additionally, using the individualized approach, we identified a different ("atypical") response pattern among the rest of the subjects (13.6%). CONCLUSION: The results support the tonic heat model of TS for future utilization. The individualized TS calculation method seems advantageous since it better reflects individual magnitudes of TS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suzan et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy subjects (n=154). Individualized calculation approach vs. Mean group calculation approach was evaluated on Temporal summation magnitude (p=<0.001). The individualized calculation approach for temporal summation yielded a significantly higher magnitude than the mean group approach (41.0 vs 31.4, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: