Key result
FibroTest accurately detects advanced fibrosis in severe obesity with a 0.85 AUROC.
Why the study?
Liver biopsy is the gold standard for assessing NAFLD histologic lesions in severe obesity, but the performance of non-invasive biomarkers in this population needed evaluation.
Do non-invasive biomarkers (FibroTest, SteatoTest, ActiTest) accurately diagnose liver lesions compared to liver biopsy in patients with severe obesity?
Meta-Analysis (n=494)
Blinded (histology and biochemical measurements blinded to other characteristics)
Yes
Do non-invasive biomarkers (FibroTest, SteatoTest, ActiTest) accurately diagnose liver lesions compared to liver biopsy in patients with severe obesity?
Non-invasive biomarkers (FibroTest, SteatoTest, ActiTest) demonstrate significant diagnostic performance for detecting liver lesions in patients with severe obesity.
Supports FibroTest for fibrosis assessment in severe obesity to potentially limit biopsies; confirms strong diagnostic performance in meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND: Liver biopsy is considered as the gold standard for assessing non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) histologic lesions in patients with severe obesity. The aim of this study was to perform an overview of 3 studies which assessed the performance of non-invasive markers of fibrosis (FibroTest), steatosis (SteatoTest) and steato-hepatitis (NashTest, ActiTest) in these patients. METHODS: 494 patients with interpretable biopsy and biomarkers using of three prospective cohorts of patients with severe obesity (BMI >35 kg/m2) were included. Histology (NAS score) and the biochemical measurements were blinded to any other characteristics. The area under the ROC curves (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were assessed. Weighted AUROC (wAUROC Obuchowski method) was used to prevent multiple testing and spectrum effect. Two meta-analyses were performed; one used the individual patient, and the other a classical meta-analysis. RESULTS: Prevalence of advanced fibrosis (bridging) was 9.9%, advanced steatosis (>33%) 54.2%, and steato-hepatitis (NAS score >4) 17.2%. The mean wAUROCs were: FibroTest for advanced fibrosis (95%CI; significance) = 0.85 (0.83-0.87; P<0.0001); SteatoTest for advanced steatosis = 0.80 (0.79-0.83); and ActiTest for steato-hepatitis = 0.84 (0.82-0.86; P<0.0001). Using the classical meta-analysis (random effect model) the mean AUROCs were: FibroTest = 0.72 (0.63-0.79; P<0.0001); SteatoTest = 0.71 (0.66-0.75; P<0.0001); and ActiTest = 0.74 (0.68-0.79; P<0.0001). Despite more metabolic risk factors in one cohort, results were similar according to gender, presence of diabetes and between the 3 cohorts. CONCLUSION: In patients with severe obesity, a significant diagnostic performance of FibroTest, SteatoTest and ActiTest was observed for liver lesions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poynard et al. (2012) conducted a meta-analysis in Severe obesity (n=494). Non-invasive biomarkers (FibroTest, SteatoTest, ActiTest) vs. Liver biopsy (gold standard) was evaluated on Diagnostic performance (weighted AUROC) of FibroTest for advanced fibrosis (wAUROC 0.85, 95% CI 0.83-0.87, p=<0.0001). In patients with severe obesity, FibroTest demonstrated significant diagnostic performance for advanced fibrosis with a mean weighted AUROC of 0.85.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: