Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper is the first to examine the incentive for partial privatization in a mixed duopoly with R&D rivalry. We show that because mixed duopolies engage in more R&D, the optimal extent of privatization is unambiguously reduced. Yet, this reduction is often very modest. Adopting the extent of privatization that would be optimal if one ignored the R&D rivalry routinely results in greater welfare than retaining a fully public firm and ignoring partial privatization. Only when R&D has an extremely low cost would it be preferable to ignore partial privatization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heywood et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: