The Pediatric Examination of Educational Readiness (PEER) is a combined neurodevelopmental, behavioral, and health assessment for children ages 4 to 6 years old. The purpose of this study was to examine its predictive validity. One hundred seven five-year-olds received the PEER at age five. At age eight, all took the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS), a nationally normed achievement battery. Mean ITBS scores were significantly different between those passing and failing the PEER Developmental Attainment section (t = 4.5, df = 105, p less than .001). Of six developmental areas sampled, preacademic skills emerged as the most potent predictor of achievement (R = .43, Re = .18, p less than .001). Neuromaturation scores did not correlate with ITBS results. Sensitivity of the PEER was 45%, specificity was 87% and test accuracy was 79%. We conclude that the PEER is useful in describing current developmental strengths and weaknesses but has limited ability in predicting future learning problems for individual children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blackman et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: