Key result
Lusutrombopag does not alter midazolam pharmacokinetics, indicating no significant CYP3A-mediated drug interaction.
Why the study?
The drug-drug interaction potentials of lusutrombopag via metabolic enzymes and transporters were not fully characterized.
Does lusutrombopag have clinically significant drug-drug interactions with midazolam or cyclosporine in healthy subjects?
Does lusutrombopag have clinically significant drug-drug interactions with midazolam or cyclosporine in healthy subjects?
Effect estimate: Ratio 1.04 (95% CI 0.967-1.11)
Absolute Event Rate: 64.9% vs 63%
Lusutrombopag demonstrates no clinically significant drug-drug interaction potential via metabolic enzymes and transporters.
Lusutrombopag DDI data are preliminary; leaves open need for patient studies on CYP3A and transporter effects.
Purpose Drug-drug interaction (DDI) potentials of lusutrombopag, a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, on the activity of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A and of cyclosporine, which inhibits P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein, on lusutrombopag pharmacokinetics were assessed via clinical studies and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. Methods The effect of lusutrombopag on midazolam (a CYP3A probe substrate) pharmacokinetics was assessed in 15 healthy subjects receiving a single midazolam 5-mg dose with or without coadministration of lusutrombopag 0.75 mg for 6 days (first dose: 1.5-mg dose). The effect of cyclosporine on lusutrombopag pharmacokinetics was assessed in 16 healthy subjects receiving a single lusutrombopag 3-mg dose with or without a single cyclosporine 400- to 600-mg dose. PBPK modeling was employed to extrapolate the effect of lusutrombopag at the clinical dose (3 mg once daily) on midazolam pharmacokinetics. Results In the clinical study, mean ratios (90% confidence intervals [CIs]) of with/without lusutrombopag for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of midazolam were 1.01 (0.908–1.13) and 1.04 (0.967–1.11), respectively, indicating no effect of lusutrombopag on midazolam pharmacokinetics. PBPK modeling suggested no effect of lusutrombopag at the clinical dose on midazolam pharmacokinetics. Mean ratios (90% CIs) of with/without cyclosporine for lusutrombopag Cmax and AUC were 1.18 (1.11–1.24) and 1.19 (1.13–1.25), respectively, indicating a slight increase in lusutrombopag exposure. Conclusions In consideration with in vitro data, the in vivo and in silico results suggested no clinically significant DDI potential of lusutrombopag with other medical products via metabolic enzymes and transporters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katsube et al. (2020) studied Healthy subjects (n=31). Lusutrombopag vs. Midazolam alone was evaluated on Midazolam AUC0-inf geometric mean ratio (with/without lusutrombopag) (Ratio 1.04, 95% CI 0.967-1.11). Coadministration of lusutrombopag did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of midazolam, with an AUC ratio of 1.04, indicating no clinically significant CYP3A-mediated drug-drug interaction.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: