Key result
Robotic gait training shows no benefit over knee-ankle-foot orthosis for improving post-stroke lateropulsion.
Why the study?
Post-stroke lateropulsion with pusher syndrome severely impacts postural control and daily activities, but the comparative effectiveness of gait exercise assist robots versus recommended knee-ankle-foot orthoses was not established.
Does gait training using a gait exercise assist robot (GEAR) improve lateropulsion compared to a knee-ankle-foot orthosis (KAFO) in stroke patients?
RCT (n=36)
randomly assigned
Yes
Does gait training using a gait exercise assist robot (GEAR) improve lateropulsion compared to a knee-ankle-foot orthosis (KAFO) in stroke patients?
Robot-assisted gait training is as effective as traditional therapist-assisted orthosis training for improving lateropulsion in stroke patients.
Background Post-stroke lateropulsion with pusher syndrome (LP) severely impacts postural control and daily activities. In Japan, while a knee-ankle-foot orthosis (KAFO) is recommended for LP treatment, a gait exercise assist robot (GEAR) is also used. Objective We investigated the effectiveness of gait training using a GEAR and KAFO in improving LP. Methods Thirty-six stroke patients with LP were randomly assigned to GEAR or KAFO groups, and received 50-min daily sessions for 2 weeks. Both the GEAR group, using robot assistance, and the KAFO group, with therapist assistance, engaged in gait training with a goal of 30 min per session. Primary outcomes were changes in Burke Lateropulsion Scale (BLS) and Scale for Contraversive Pushing (SCP) scores. Results Seventeen participants in each group completed their respective interventions. Both groups showed marked improvements in BLS and SCP scores (all p < 0.001). Although the GEAR group achieved greater walking distances and step counts ( p < 0.01 each), overall BLS and SCP improvements did not significantly differ between the groups ( p = 0.51 and 0.84, respectively). Both interventions demonstrated comparable LP improvement to previous studies. Conclusions We found no significant difference in the treatment effects between the two interventions, indicating both to be effective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abe et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Post-stroke lateropulsion with pusher syndrome (LP) (n=36). Gait exercise assist robot (GEAR) vs. Knee-ankle-foot orthosis (KAFO) was evaluated on Changes in Burke Lateropulsion Scale (BLS) and Scale for Contraversive Pushing (SCP) scores (p=0.51 and 0.84). Gait training using a gait exercise assist robot did not significantly differ from a knee-ankle-foot orthosis in improving Burke Lateropulsion Scale (p=0.51) and SCP scores (p=0.84).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: