Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
April 16, 2016Ciência RuralOpen Access

A revision of two distinct species of Rhipicephalus: R. microplus and R. australis

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

AAAbid AliLPLuís Fernando PariziBFBeatriz Rossetti Ferreira

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Ali et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aaf6889413fdd9b64ce968ahttps://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20151416
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Interaction of the tick immune system with transmitted pathogens2013 · 251 citations
  2. 2Mitochondrial gene order is not conserved in arthropods: prostriate and metastriate tick mitochondrial genomes1998 · 249 citations
  3. 3The novel mitochondrial gene arrangement of the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus: fivefold tandem repetition of a coding region1999 · 101 citations
  4. 4Probing the functional role of tick metalloproteases2015 · 55 citations
  5. 5ANALYSIS OF THE SYSTEMATIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG TICKS OF THE GENERA<i>RHIPICEPHALUS</i>AND<i>BOOPHILUS</i>(ACARI: IXODIDAE) BASED ON MITOCHONDRIAL 12S RIBOSOMAL DNA GENE SEQUENCES AND MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERS2001 · 418 citations