Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Why and when to manage intracranial hypertensionThe detrimental effects of intracranial hypertension (HICP, high intracranial pressure) are well documented [1,2].HICP can cause secondary brain injury and death, and therefore, intracranial pressure (ICP) elevations should be aggressively treated.HICP has been classically defined as an ICP > 20 mmHg, and this threshold has been considered the trigger for treatment [3].Recent BTF guidelines have moved this threshold to 22 mmHg [4], grounded on a single-centre, retrospective study.This modification is trivial [5].As for many other treatment options in intensive care, a single threshold is debatable.In fact, recent evidence suggests that not a single value but the time spent over the threshold and its intensity, the so-called ICP dose, is more important [6].Moreover, Guiza demonstrated that not only higher values but also prolonged exposure to values below the classical threshold are associated with negative outcomes [7].In addition, if cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP, i.e.MAP-ICP) is critically low (< 50 mmHg), ICP is no longer a predictor for poor outcome and lower ICP values might be barely tolerated.On the contrary, ICP insults in the range 18-23 mmHg can be tolerated for a longer duration at higher CPPs.In my practice, the ICP alarm is set at 20 mmHg and low CPP alarm at 55 mmHg.This is a warning signal for nurses at the bedside.Before starting any treatments for high ICP, I consider both the intensity and duration of HICP.I am flexible with thresholds putting them in the clinical contest, considering also CPP.Short-lasting, low-intensity episodes (low ICP dose with normal CPP) are observed and not treated.On the contrary, higher ICP doses, progressively rising trends, or/ and HICP impacting CPP require prompt treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robba et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: