Key result
Alfentanil at 100 ng/ml cuts required propofol infusion rates by ~43% during total abdominal hysterectomy.
Why the study?
The optimal dosing rate and target plasma concentration of propofol to supplement nitrous oxide with varying alfentanil concentrations during total abdominal hysterectomy were not established.
Does a target-controlled infusion of alfentanil reduce the required dose of propofol and improve recovery time in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy?
RCT (n=60)
No
Does a target-controlled infusion of alfentanil reduce the required dose of propofol and improve recovery time in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy?
Absolute Event Rate: 5.1% vs 8.9%
p-value: p=<0.05
Target-controlled infusion of alfentanil at 50 or 100 ng/ml significantly reduces the required propofol dose and shortens induction and recovery times in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy.
Hypothesis-generating for propofol-alfentanil dosing in TAH; prospective trials needed before clinical adoption.
Background: Alfentanil has been shown to act synergistically if combined with propofol, with or without nitrous oxide, or if combined with potent inhalation anesthetics.The goal of this study was to determine the dosing rate and target plasma concentration of propofol to supplement nitrous oxide in the presence of varying concentrations of alfentanil and to determine the optimal combination of propofol and alfentanil.Methods: Sixty patients undergoing a total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) were anesthetized with nitrous oxide, and given a target-controlled infusion (TCI) of alfentanil [target plasma concentrations of 0 (A0 group), 50 ng/ml (A50 group), and 100 ng/ml (A100 group)], and propofol at rates varied up and down depending on the bispectal index (BIS).The mean target concentration (Tc) and infusion rate of propofol according to changes of concentrations of alfentanil were determined.Recovery time (from infusion stop to eye opening) and side effects were compared.Results: Induction time and recovery time were shortened in the A50 group and A100 group compared with the A0 group (P < 0.05).The infusion rate and mean target concentration of propofol were significantly lower in the A100 group (7.5 mg/kg/h, 3.4μg/ml) than the A0 (12.6 mg/kg/h, 4.5μg/ml) and A50 (10.2 mg/kg/h, 4.0μg/ml) groups (P < 0.01).Side effects did not differ among the three groups.Conclusions: The optimal blood propofol and plasma alfentanil concentration, with respect to satisfactory intraoperative anesthetic conditions and speed of recovery, are 4.0μg/ml and 50 ng/ml or 3.4μg/ ml and 100 ng/ml in TAH patients.(Korean J Anesthesiol 2002; 42: 438∼445) ꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏ
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2002) conducted an RCT in Total Abdominal Hysterectomy (n=60). Alfentanil and Propofol vs. Propofol without alfentanil (0 ng/ml) was evaluated on Infusion rate of propofol (p=<0.05). Target-controlled infusion of alfentanil at 100 ng/ml significantly reduced the required infusion rate of propofol to 5.1 mg/kg/h compared to 8.9 mg/kg/h without alfentanil in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: