Key result
4-tiered LVH classification better discriminates exercise-induced remodeling patterns than the 2-tiered approach.
Why the study?
Long-term endurance sport practice leads to eccentric LVH, but the comparative performance of the new 4-tiered versus established 2-tiered LVH classifications in normotensive non-elite endurance athletes was unclear.
Does a 4-tiered classification of left ventricular hypertrophy better discriminate exercise-induced remodeling patterns than a 2-tiered classification in normotensive endurance athletes?
Cross-Sectional (n=174)
No
Does a 4-tiered classification of left ventricular hypertrophy better discriminate exercise-induced remodeling patterns than a 2-tiered classification in normotensive endurance athletes?
A 4-tiered classification of LVH provides superior discrimination of exercise-induced cardiac remodeling patterns in endurance athletes compared to the traditional 2-tiered approach.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
4-tiered LVH classification may better discriminate remodeling patterns in endurance athletes; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Long-term endurance sport practice leads to eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). We aimed to compare the new 4-tiered classification (4TC) for LVH with the established 2-tiered classification (2TC) in a cohort of normotensive non-elite endurance athletes. METHODS: Male participants of a 10-mile race were recruited and included when blood pressure (BP) was normal (<140/90 mmHg). Phenotypic characterization of LVH was based on relative wall thickness (2TC), and on LV concentricity2/3 (LV mass/end-diastolic volume [LVM/EDV]2/3) plus LVEDV index (4TC). Parameters of LV geometry, BP, cumulative training hours, and race time were compared between 2TC and 4TC by analysis of variance, and post-hoc analysis. RESULTS: Of 198 athletes recruited, 174 were included. Mean age was 41.6±7.5 years. Forty-two (24%) athletes had LVH. Allocation in the 2TC was: 32 (76%) eccentric LVH and 10 (24%) concentric LVH. Using the 4TC 12 were reclassified to concentric LVH, and 2 to eccentric LVH, resulting in 22 (52%) eccentric LVH (7 non-dilated, 15 dilated), and 20 (48%) concentric LVH (all non-dilated). Based on the 2TC, markers of endurance training did not differ between eccentric and concentric LVH. Based on the 4TC, athletes with eccentric LVH had more cumulative training hours and faster race times, with highest values thereof in athletes with eccentric dilated LVH. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of normotensive endurance athletes, the new 4TC demonstrated a superior discrimination of exercise-induced LVH patterns, compared to the established 2TC, most likely because it takes three-dimensional information of the ventricular geometry into account.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trachsel et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Left ventricular hypertrophy in endurance athletes (n=174). 4-tiered classification of left ventricular hypertrophy vs. 2-tiered classification was evaluated on Discrimination of cumulative lifetime training hours and 10-mile race time between LVH patterns (p=<0.001). The 4-tiered classification of left ventricular hypertrophy demonstrated superior discrimination of exercise-induced remodeling patterns compared to the 2-tiered classification.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: