Key result
Single-use ECG leads linked to ~26% lower 90-day surgical site infection risk post-CABG versus reusable systems.
Why the study?
Post-operative surgical site infection is a concern for Medicare patients undergoing CABG surgery with ECG monitoring, and the cost effectiveness of single-patient-use ECG cable and lead systems is unclear.
Does a single-patient-use ECG cable and lead system improve cost effectiveness and reduce surgical site infections compared to reusable systems in Medicare patients undergoing CABG surgery?
Observational (n=27,296)
Yes
Does a single-patient-use ECG cable and lead system improve cost effectiveness and reduce surgical site infections compared to reusable systems in Medicare patients undergoing CABG surgery?
Odds Ratio: 0.74 (95% CI 0.62–0.89)
Single-patient-use ECG cables and leads in CABG patients reduce surgical site infections and provide long-term cost savings compared to reusable systems.
May support spECG for CABG cost savings in modeling; leaves open practice change without prospective validation.
Background: During admission for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery patients receive electrocardiograph (ECG) monitoring; for which reusable ECG cable and leads (rECG) are standard. Objective: Evaluate the cost effectiveness of a single-patient-use ECG cable and lead system (spECG). Methods: Review of the Medicare 2011-2014 database followed by a cost-effectiveness model considering a Medicare facility transitioning from rECG ($9 per patient) to spECG ($15). In-hospital ECG monitoring was for ≤8 days. In the model, patients underwent CABG and recovered in the intensive care unit, before transfer to the general ward and discharge. Surgical site infection (SSI) resulted in increased length of stay, readmission, or outpatient care. Health outcomes impacted EQ-5D-measured quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Health and cost outcomes were discounted at 3.5% annually. All costs in 2016 USD. Significance (95% level) was assessed via 2,000 simulations. Results: In 2014, 5.49% of patients had an SSI by 90-days post-surgery, with spECG reducing the odds of an SSI (odds ratio: 0.74, 0.62-0.89). Mean 40-year, per-patient costs to Medicare were $65,497 with rECG and $65,048 with spECG. The $450 saving was significant, with a median (95% credible interval) reduction of $466 ($174 to $989). Cost drivers were days required to treat inpatient SSIs. QALYs increases with spECG were significant but minor (median increase 0.008). Medicare savings may total $40 million per year with use of spECG. Conclusions: Post-operative SSI is a concern for Medicare patients undergoing CABG, and use of spECG is likely to provide cost and patient benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saunders et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgery (n=27,296). Single-patient-use electrocardiograph cable and lead system (spECG) vs. Reusable ECG cable and leads (rECG) was evaluated on Surgical site infection (SSI) at 90-days post-surgery (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.89). Single-patient-use electrocardiograph cable and lead systems reduced the odds of a 90-day surgical site infection by 26% (OR 0.74) compared to reusable systems in patients undergoing CABG surgery.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: