Key result
AcrVIB1 inhibits CRISPR-Cas13b immunity by binding the Helical-2 domain to promote crRNA degradation.
Why the study?
The mechanism by which AcrVIB1 inhibits Cas13b-mediated CRISPR immunity was not fully understood, particularly its action upstream of RNP complex formation.
AcrVIB1's upstream crRNA destabilization expands Acr mechanisms; leaves open refined CRISPR tool design for research.
SUMMARY Anti-CRISPR proteins (Acrs) inhibit CRISPR-Cas immune defenses, with almost all known Acrs acting on the Cas nuclease-CRISPR (cr)RNA ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex. Here, we show that AcrVIB1, the only known Acr against Cas13b, principally acts upstream of RNP complex formation by promoting unproductive crRNA binding followed by crRNA degradation. AcrVIB1 tightly binds to Cas13b but not to the Cas13b-crRNA complex, resulting in enhanced rather than blocked crRNA binding. However, the more tightly-bound crRNA does not undergo processing and exhibits altered target RNA binding that fails to activate collateral RNA cleavage. The bound crRNA is also accessible to RNases, leading to crRNA turnover in vivo even in the presence of Cas13b. Finally, cryo-EM structures revealed that AcrVIB1 binds a helical domain of Cas13b responsible for securing the crRNA, keeping the domain in an untethered state. These findings reveal an Acr that converts an effector nuclease into a crRNA sink to suppress CRISPR-Cas defense. Highlights AcrVIB1 binds Cas13b in the absence of a crRNA The bound AcrVIB1 promotes crRNA binding to Cas13b The crRNA binds Cas13b unproductively and is accessible to RNases AcrVIB1 binds the Helical-2 domain of Cas13b, preventing it from securing the crRNA
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wandera et al. (2024) studied this question. AcrVIB1 was evaluated on CRISPR-Cas13b immunity inhibition and crRNA binding. AcrVIB1 inhibits CRISPR-Cas13b immunity by binding the Helical-2 domain of Cas13b, promoting unproductive crRNA binding and rendering it accessible to RNase degradation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: