Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Changes in Craniocervical and Trunk Flexion Angles and Gluteal Pressure during VDT Work with Continuous Cross‐legged Sitting: Jung‐Hoon Lee, et al. Department of Physical Therapy, Inje University Pusan Paik Hospital and Department of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School, Inje University, Republic of Korea— Objectives This study investigated changes in craniocervical and trunk lexion angles and gluteal pressure on both sides during visual display terminal (VDT) work with continuous cross‐legged sitting. Methods The gluteal pressures of ten VDTworkers, who were recruited from laboratories, were measured using a Teckscan system and videotaped using a single video camera to capture the craniocervical and trunk lexion angles during VDT work at 30 s, 10, 20 and 30 min. Results The craniocervical angle was significantly increased at 10 and 20 mincompared with the initial angle (p<0.05). The trunk lexion angle was significantly decreased at 30 s, 10, 20 and 30 min (p<0.05). The gluteal pressure of the crossed‐leg side significantly increased at 30 s, 10 and 20 min (p<0.05). The gluteal pressure of the uncrossedleg side significantly decreased at 30 s (p<0.05). Conclusion We found that cross‐legged sitting during VDT work may exert disadvantageous postural effects resulting from craniocervical and trunk lexion angles and gluteal pressure. Therefore, this posture could not be recommended during long‐term VDT work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: