Key result
Dabigatran 110 mg is linked to ~31% lower stroke and systemic embolism risk versus VKA.
Why the study?
The 1-year safety and effectiveness of dabigatran 110 mg or 150 mg twice daily compared to vitamin K antagonists in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients was not well established in real-life settings.
Does dabigatran 110 mg or 150 mg twice daily reduce stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, and death compared to vitamin K antagonists in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=22,831)
Yes
Does dabigatran 110 mg or 150 mg twice daily reduce stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, and death compared to vitamin K antagonists in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
In a real-world nationwide French cohort, dabigatran 110 mg and 150 mg were associated with lower risks of major bleeding and death compared to vitamin K antagonists in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dabigatran 110 mg was associated with lower stroke/SE risk than VKA; extends real-world data but leaves optimal dosing and practice change open.
Aims We compared the 1‐year safety and effectiveness of dabigatran 110 mg (D110) or 150 mg (D150) twice daily to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Methods New user cohort study of patients dispensed D110 or D150 vs. VKA in 2013 for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, followed 1 year in the French Système National des Données de Santé (66 million persons). D110 and D150 users were matched 1:1 with VKA users on sex, age, date of first drug dispensing and high‐dimensional propensity score. Hazard ratios [HR (95% confidence intervals)] for stroke and systemic embolism (SSE), major bleeding (MB) and death were computed using Cox proportional hazards or Fine and Gray models during exposure. Results In 14 442 matched D110 and VKA patients, mean age 79, 49% male, 91% with CHA2DS2‐VASc ≥2 and 8% with HAS‐BLED score >3, incidence rates of SSE were 1.9% and 2.6% person‐years [HR 0.69 (0.56–0.84)], MB 1.8% and 2.9% [0.62 (0.51–0.76)], death 7.2% and 8.6% [0.84 (0.76–0.94)]. In 8389 matched D150 and VKA patients, mean age 67, 67% male, 65% with CHA2DS2‐VASC ≥2; < 5% HAS‐BLED >3, incidence rates were for SSE 1.4% and 1.9% [0.76 (0.56–1.04)], MB 0.6% and 1.9% [0.30 (0.20–0.46)], death 1.6% and 3.6% [0.46 (0.35–0.59)]. Numbers needed to treat to observe one fewer death were 78 for D110, 88 for D150. Conclusion In real life D110 and D150 were at least as effective, and safer than VKA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blin et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (n=22,831). Dabigatran vs. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) was evaluated on stroke and systemic embolism (SSE) (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56-0.84). Dabigatran 110 mg reduced stroke and systemic embolism compared to VKA (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.56-0.84), while dabigatran 150 mg showed similar rates (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.56-1.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: