Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Two mass-marking techniques were evaluated in the laboratory to determine effects on survival and flight behavior of Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte. The marking agents were an externally applied fluorescent powder (Day-Clo) and an internal oil soluble dye (Calico oil red) incorporated into an artificial adult diet. Neither technique had a significant influence on survival of 5-10-d-old or 20-25-d-old female or male beetles up to 10 d after marking. Based on tethered-flight assays, marking with fluorescent dust generally had no effect on trivial or sustained flight performance of 5-10-d-old and 20-2S-d-old females or 15-d-old males. Beetles marked with the oil-soluble dye experienced reductions in trivial flight performance, including reductions in individual flight duration, frequency of flight, and total flight time in a 23-h period, for up to 2 d after marking. Both techniques are efficient, but in comparison with Day-Glo fluorescent powder, beetles marked with Calico oil red retain the mark for a shorter time period. Also, beetles marked with Calico oil red should be provided suitable food for at least 2 d after marking to allow recovery of normal fight behavior before they are used in studies involving flight activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steven E. Naranjo (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: