This paper derives and demonstrates two models to represent defect transport through mixed-conducting ceramic membranes. The Nernst–Planck–Poisson (NPP) model is more general, but requires the computational solution of a boundary-value problem on a mesh network. The Integral method relies on more assumptions, but defect fluxes can be evaluated analytically based upon material properties and gas-phase composition at the membrane surfaces. Using examples based upon yttrium-doped barium zirconate, the two approaches are compared quantitatively. Under many circumstances the models deliver quantitatively similar results, but for situations where the membrane is exposed to large and/or multiple partial-pressure gradients, the predicted fluxes can deviate. The variations are the result of different physical assumptions and mathematical simplifications that are being used in the two models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vøllestad et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: