The utilization of steel slag (SS), fly ash (FA), and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) as soil additives in construction represents a critical approach to achieving resource recycling of these industrial by-products. This study aims to activate the SS-FA-GGBFS composite with a NaOH solution and Na2CO3 and employ the activated solid waste blend as an admixture for lateritic clay modification. By varying the concentration of the NaOH solution and the dosage of Na2CO3 relative to the SS-FA-GGBFS composite, the effects of these parameters on the activation efficiency of the composite as a lateritic clay additive were investigated. Results indicate that the NaOH solution activates the SS-FA-GGBFS composite more effectively than Na2CO3. The NaOH solution significantly promotes the depolymerization of aluminosilicates in the solid waste materials and the generation of Calcium-Silicate-Hydrate and Calcium-Aluminate-Hydrate gels. In contrast, Na2CO3 relies on its carbonate ions to react with calcium ions in the materials, forming calcium carbonate precipitates. As a rigid cementing phase, calcium carbonate exhibits a weaker cementing effect on soil compared to Calcium-Silicate-Hydrate and Calcium-Aluminate-Hydrate gels. However, excessive NaOH leads to inefficient dissolution of the solid waste and induces a transformation of hydration products in the modified lateritic clay from Calcium-Silicate-Hydrate and Calcium-Aluminate-Hydrate to Sodium-Silicate-Hydrate and Sodium-Aluminate-Hydrate, which negatively impacts the strength and microstructural compactness of the alkali-activated solid waste composite-modified lateritic clay.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qiao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: