This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND: Cancer-induced bone pain (CIBP) is a debilitating complication with few effective treatments. Microglial activation contributes to the progression of CIBP. 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG), a glycolytic inhibitor, could inhibit microglial activation. Its effect on CIBP remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the role of 2-DG in CIBP mice and underlying mechanisms. METHODS: In this research, we established a CIBP mouse model by injecting Lewis lung cancer (LLC) cells into the bone marrow of the femur. Relevant pain behaviors were assessed by measuring the paw withdrawal threshold and spontaneous hind limb lifting. Additionally, the glycolysis inhibitor 2-DG was intrathecally administered to treat CIBP in mice. Western blotting and immunofluorescence techniques were employed to analyze microglial activation and M1/M2 phenotype markers in the spinal cord. RESULTS: Our findings demonstrated significant microglial activation and polarization toward the M1 phenotype in the spinal cord of CIBP mice. Intrathecal administration of 2-DG effectively alleviated pain-related behaviors in CIBP mice. Furthermore, this treatment suppressed microglial activation and M1 polarization, while significantly restoring levels of the M2 phenotype. Additionally, 2-DG attenuated the production of pro-inflammatory factors such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and interleukin-6 (IL-6), while boosting the secretion of the anti-inflammatory factor (IL-10) in the spinal cord of CIBP mice. Notably, 2-DG effectively suppresses microglia activation and M1 polarization in LPS + IFN-γ-induced BV-2 cells by downregulating CD86, iNOS expression, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 levels while upregulating Arg-1, CD206 expression and IL-10 level. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that 2-DG ameliorates mechanical allodynia, spontaneous pain and neuroinflammation in the spinal cord of CIBP mice by promoting the transition from the M1 phenotype to the M2 phenotype. This study may provide a novel strategy for the treatment of CIBP.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: