Key result
Community pharmacist mobile ECG QTc screening prompts prescriber contact for ~11% of at-risk patients.
Why the study?
The health care system faces challenges in mitigating the risk of drug-induced long-QT syndrome and sudden cardiac death in patients using QTc prolonging medications, with community pharmacists intervening infrequently despite receiving QTc alerts.
Does a community pharmacist-delivered mobile ECG assessment program improve risk stratification and medication management in patients receiving QTc prolonging medications?
Does a community pharmacist-delivered mobile ECG assessment program improve risk stratification and medication management in patients receiving QTc prolonging medications?
Community pharmacists can feasibly use mobile ECG devices to identify patients at risk for drug-induced long-QT syndrome and facilitate appropriate medication changes.
May support pharmacist QTc screening feasibility; leaves open whether it improves outcomes or warrants adoption.
Introduction For patients using QTc prolonging medications, the health care system is challenged to mitigate the risk of drug‐induced long‐QT syndrome (DiLQTS) and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Community pharmacists (CPs) receive QTc alerts when dispensing but intervene infrequently. Personal electrocardiogram (ECG) monitors are a new, inexpensive technology that could provide additional patient risk information to identify individuals with a prolonged QTc interval in real time. Objectives (1) Describe QTc interval‐prolonging medications, QTc interval calculations, and associated interventions and prescriber responses for a CP‐delivered QTc interval assessment program, and (2) Describe patient satisfaction with the service. Methods A prospective study of 9‐month duration in three community pharmacies in Iowa. CPs were trained to measure QTc interval using the KardiaMobile ECG monitor. English‐speaking patients aged ≥18 years were recruited to have a 30 seconds ECG tracing if the CP received a computer QTc‐related alert or had concern about QTc effect/interaction. CPs used professional judgment regarding prescriber contact but were required to contact the prescriber if the QTc interval was prolonged (>470 ms males, >480 ms females). Results There were 53 patients who met study criteria and participated in the service. Mean age was 55.1 years, 38 (72%) were female, and 19 (36%) received newly prescribed QTc interval‐prolonging medications. A computer‐generated QTc alert was present for 36 (68%) of participants. CPs contacted a prescriber for 6 (11%) patients regarding concern for DiLQTS (mean QTc 495 ms). Of these six instances, three had QTc prolongation requiring mandatory prescriber contact (mean QTc 529 ms). Prescriber contact resulted in medication changes for 3 (50%) patients. Conclusion CPs were able to measure QTc interval, identify patients at risk for DiLQTS, and make accepted medication therapy recommendations related to QTc prolongation. CP assessment of QTc interval may be a useful approach to improve risk stratification of individuals at risk of DiLQTS and SCD. Trial registration: Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT04000542.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoehns et al. (2021) studied Patients receiving QTc prolonging medications (n=53). Community pharmacist-delivered QTc interval assessment using mobile ECG was evaluated on Prescriber contact regarding concern for drug-induced long-QT syndrome. Community pharmacist use of mobile ECG to assess QTc interval led to prescriber contact for 11% of at-risk patients (6/53) and resulted in medication changes for 3 patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: