Darwin’s provisional theory of Pangenesis claims our belief on the ground that it is the only theory which explains, by a single law, the numerous phenomena allied to simple reproduction, such as reversion, growth, and repair of injuries. On the other hand, its postulates are hypothetical and large, so that few naturalists seem willing to grant them.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Francis Galton (1871) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: