Vitamin D receptor (VDR) is a member of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily. When bound to a variety of vitamin D analogues, VDR manifests a wide diversity of physiological actions. The molecular mechanism by which different vitamin D analogues cause specific responses is not understood. The published crystallographic structures of the ligand binding domain of VDR (VDR-LBD) complexed with ligands that have differential biological activities have exhibited identical protein conformations. Here we report that rat VDR-LBD (rVDR-LBD) in solution exhibits differential chemical shifts when bound to three ligands that cause diverse responses: the natural hormone, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) [1,25(OH)₂D₃], a potent agonist analogue, 2-methylene-19-nor-(20S)-1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D₃ [2MD], and an antagonist, 2-methylene-(22E)-(24R)-25-carbobutoxy-26,27-cyclo-22-dehydro-1α,24-dihydroxy-19-norvitamin D₃ [OU-72]. Ligand-specific chemical shifts mapped not only to residues at or near the binding pocket but also to residues remote from the ligand binding site. The complexes of rVDR-LBD with native hormone and the potent agonist 2MD exhibited chemical shift differences in signals from helix-12, which is part of the AF2 transactivation domain that appears to play a role in the selective recruitment of coactivators. By contrast, formation of the complex of rVDR-LBD with the antagonist OU-72 led to disappearance of signals from residues in helices-11 and -12. We present evidence that disorder in this region of the receptor in the antagonist complex prevents the attachment of coactivators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singarapu et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: