The articles in this issue signify the maturation of social constructionism. After introducing the articles, I raise two questions that have remained under-represented on these pages. First, the historicization of constructionism has been avoided by constructionists and critics alike; and, second, the epistemological concerns have been dominated by realist-anti-realist debates. I conclude by inviting further responses on these questions for a future issue of the journal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henderikus J. Stam (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: