Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopkins, anti aggregation pheromone, 3-methylcyclohex-2-en-1-one (MCH), was applied to stands of Douglas-fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirabel) Franco, at high risk for infestation to determine the lowest effective dose for protecting live trees. MCH was applied at rates of 50, 100, and 150 bubble capsules per hectare (20, 40, and 60 g/ha, respectively) in 1994, and 15, 30, and 50 bubble capsules per hectare (6, 12, and 20 g/ha, respectively) in 1995. Mean release rates throughout the beetle flight periods in 1994 and 1995 were 1.63 and 1.23 milligrams per capsule per day, respectively. For both years, catches of Douglas-fir beetles in pheromone-baited traps located at the plot centers were significantly lower on all MCH-treated plots compared with untreated plots, but there were no differences among the 3 doses of MCH. In contrast, NCR had no effect on the numbers of 3 predators [Thanasimus undatulus (Say), Enoclerus sphegeus F., and Temnochila chlorodia (Mannerheim)] collected in the traps during either year. In 1994, the percentage of Douglas-fir ≥20 cm diameter at breast height (abh) that were mass attacked was significantly lower on MCH-treated plots compared with the untreated control, and all 3 doses were equally effective. In 1995, there were no significant differences in the percentage of mass-attacked trees among the treatments. These results demonstrate that MCH applied at rates as low as 20 g/ha (50 bubble capsules per hectare) can reduce the probability that high-risk Douglas-fir will become infested.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ross et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: