Key result
Poor risk factor control in PAD linked to ~134% higher 30-day MAVE risk versus optimal control.
Why the study?
The effect of risk factor control on outcomes and disparities in patients with peripheral artery disease is less well understood.
Does optimal risk factor control reduce major adverse vascular events in patients with peripheral artery disease?
Cohort (n=781)
Does optimal risk factor control reduce major adverse vascular events in patients with peripheral artery disease?
Risk factor control is poor among patients with PAD, with significant racial and socioeconomic disparities, though its association with 1-year MAVE was not significant after adjustment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Suboptimal PAD risk factor control shows racial and socioeconomic disparities without adjusted 1-year outcome links; leaves open whether closing gaps improves equity.
Background Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is associated with modifiable atherosclerotic risk factors like hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and smoking. However, the effect of risk factor control on outcomes and disparities in achieving control is less well understood. Methods All patients in an integrated, regional health system with PAD-related encounters, fee-for-service Medicare, and clinical risk factor control data were identified. Component risk factors were dichotomized into controlled and uncontrolled categories (control defined as low-density lipoprotein < 100 mg/dL, hemoglobin A1c < 7.0%, SBP < 140 mmHg, and current nonsmoker) and composite categories (none, 1, ⩾ 2 uncontrolled RFs) created. The primary outcome was major adverse vascular events (MAVE, a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and lower-extremity revascularization and amputation). Results The cohort included 781 patients with PAD, average age 72.5 ± 9.8 years, of whom 30.1% were Black, and 19.1% were Medicaid dual-enrolled. In this cohort, 260 (33.3%) had no uncontrolled risk factors and 200 (25.6%) had two or more uncontrolled risk factors. Patients with the poorest risk factor control were more likely to be Black ( p < 0.001), Medicaid dual-enrolled ( p < 0.001), and have chronic limb-threatening ischemia ( p = 0.009). Significant differences in MAVE by degree of risk factor control were observed at 30 days (none uncontrolled: 5.8%, 1 uncontrolled: 11.5%, ⩾ 2 uncontrolled: 13.6%; p = 0.01) but not at 1 year ( p = 0.08). risk factor control was not associated with outcomes at 1 year after adjustment for patient and PAD-specific characteristics. Conclusions risk factor control is poor among patients with PAD. Significant disparities in achieving optimal risk factor control represent a potential target for reducing inequities in outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pohlman et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Peripheral artery disease (PAD) (n=781). Uncontrolled risk factors vs. No uncontrolled risk factors was evaluated on Major adverse vascular events (MAVE, a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and lower-extremity revascularization and amputation) (p=0.01). Poor risk factor control (≥2 uncontrolled) in patients with PAD was associated with increased major adverse vascular events at 30 days compared to optimal control (13.6% vs 5.8%; p=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: