Good weighing practice usually dictates that, when using double-substitution weighing to determine the mass difference between two weights, the nominal value of the sensitivity weight used to calibrate the optical scale of the mass comparator be at least four times greater than the difference of the two weights being compared. However, there are times when other considerations must override this rule. We examine the theoretical basis for the rule and the penalty for violating it. Finally, we propose a modi-fied weighing scheme which imposes a much less stringent rule for the size of the sensitivity weight. The new scheme requires an additional balance reading, but does not increase the overall measurement time significantly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richard Davis (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: