Key result
Child protection training generally meets participant needs and relevance despite low response rates.
Why the study?
The evaluation of Children First Basic Level Training and Keeping Safe Basic Level Training was conducted to assess their relevance, effectiveness, and to inform future training development in child protection.
Evaluation of child protection training in Ireland showed positive feedback but was limited by a low response rate, highlighting the need for better evaluation methods.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluation of statutory child protection training may guide voluntary services; leaves open need for rigorous outcome trials before wider adoption.
The aim of this paper is to report on the evaluation of two standardised training programmes provided by the statutory children and family service in the Republic of Ireland in 2012. This involved an evaluation of Children First Basic Level Training, which was delivered to all staff employed in the statutory services, and Keeping Safe, Basic Level Training, which was delivered externally to those working with children and families in voluntary and community services. The objectives of this review were: to determine the perceived need of all participants on both training programmes; to establish the relevance of the training programmes vis-à-vis the participants work practice; to evaluate whether both training programmes have met their stated aims; and to establish the necessary components of a training programme to inform future development. This retrospective review was conducted using mixed methods. The findings show that, in the main, the needs of the respondents were met by the training. Most respondents agreed that the training met its aims and was relevant. Valuable suggestions were made regarding development for the future. However, due to an unexpectedly low response rate to the research, the low sample size has meant that we cannot deduce that the mostly positive results are representative of participants in the training programmes as a whole. However, while not a reliable representation of the whole trainee population, the findings are nonetheless illustrative and instructive as a guide within this complex and important field for the development of future training. It is concluded that given the ongoing challenge of protecting children from abuse and neglect, the findings will inform a renewed commitment to ongoing development of generic training as well as the development of more advanced methods of evaluation, and increased engagement of training participants in the research process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Devaney et al. (2015) conducted a review in Child protection training. Children First Basic Level Training and Keeping Safe Basic Level Training was evaluated on Perceived need, relevance, and whether training aims were met. Child protection training programs in Ireland generally met participants' needs and were considered relevant, though results are limited by a low response rate.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: