Key result
Abnormal pulse wave velocity linked to ~414% higher stroke risk and increased coronary events.
Why the study?
The relationship between pulse wave velocity and cardiovascular risk in the general population is not well known.
Does abnormal pulse wave velocity predict stroke and coronary events in a low to moderate cardiovascular risk population?
Cohort (n=2,200)
Does abnormal pulse wave velocity predict stroke and coronary events in a low to moderate cardiovascular risk population?
Abnormal pulse wave velocity is a strong independent predictor of stroke and coronary events in a low to moderate cardiovascular risk population.
May refine stratification in low-moderate risk groups; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Introduction: Pulse wave velocity (PWV) has been used as a marker of arterial stiffness, although its relationship with cardiovascular risk in the general population is not well known. Methods and Results: We studied a cohort of 2200 subjects (1290 men and 910 women) of Portuguese nationality, aged between 18 and 91 years (mean: 46.33 ± 13.76 years). Annual clinical evaluation determination of PWV with the Complior method was made, and the occurrence of major cardiovascular events was observed. During the follow-up (21.42 ± 10.76 months), there were 47 non-fatal major cardiovascular events (MACE - 2.1% of the sample), of which 25 (1.1%) were stroke and 18 (0.8%) coronary events. PWV was significantly higher in patients with stroke and coronary events compared with subjects with no events (11.83 ± 2.02 m / s vs 10:03 ± 2.21 m / s, and 11.62 ± 2.02 m / s vs 10:04 ± 2.26 m / s, respectively, p < 0001). The cohort was divided into 2 groups according to the classification of PWV as normal (VOP < 95th percentile) or abnormal (VOP > 95th percentile), according to normality criteria determined in a healthy population. The cumulative survival for stroke at 2 years was 99.6% in the normal PWV group and 97.3% for the high PWV group (p < 0.001), and 99.7% and 98.2% respectively for coronary events (p < 0.001). The hazard ratio (HR) for stroke (adjusted for other conventional risk factors) was 5,142 (95% CI: 1915–17804, p < 0.001) for the abnormal PWV group. Regarding coronary events, the adjusted HR was 3,681 (95% CI: 1215–11158, p < 0.001) for the abnormal PWV group. Conclusion: The results of this sub-analysis of the EDIVA project illustrate the clinical relevance of PWV as a marker of cardiovascular risk, particularly relevant in the prediction of stroke and coronary events, highlighting its importance in defining cardiovascular prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maldonado et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in Low to moderate cardiovascular risk (n=2,200). Abnormal pulse wave velocity (>95th percentile) vs. Normal pulse wave velocity (<95th percentile) was evaluated on Stroke (HR 5.142, 95% CI 1.915-17.804, p=< 0.001). Abnormal pulse wave velocity (>95th percentile) was associated with a significantly higher risk of stroke (HR 5.142; 95% CI 1.915-17.804; p<0.001) and coronary events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: