Key result
A 6-month physical activity intervention fails to improve monocyte tissue factor expression in carotid atherosclerosis.
Why the study?
In pro-inflammatory conditions like atherosclerosis, circulating monocytes may express tissue factor, increasing thromboembolic risk, but the impact of physical activity on coagulation is limited.
Does a 6-month physical activity intervention improve the procoagulant and proinflammatory state in asymptomatic patients with carotid atherosclerosis?
RCT
Randomized
Does a 6-month physical activity intervention improve the procoagulant and proinflammatory state in asymptomatic patients with carotid atherosclerosis?
Asymptomatic patients with carotid atherosclerosis exhibit a higher procoagulant and proinflammatory profile compared to healthy subjects, which is not improved by a 6-month home-based physical activity intervention.
Patients with asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis show heightened procoagulant monocyte TF; moderate PA leaves open any mitigation of this profile.
Background In pro-inflammatory conditions, such as atherosclerosis, circulating monocytes may express tissue factor (TF), increasing thromboembolic risk. Regular physical activity (PA) has been shown to modulate hemostasis by reducing fibrinogen concentration and platelet activation, though its effects on coagulation are limited. Objectives We aim to evaluate the procoagulant and proinflammatory state in asymptomatic patients with atherosclerotic carotids compared to healthy subjects and to assess the impact of a 6-month PA intervention. Methods This study included patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis and healthy subjects. Patients were randomized into a PA group (6-month individualized PA intervention), and a control group. Blood analyses were performed to assess monocyte phenotype and TF expression by flow cytometry, and coagulation parameters using rotative thromboelastometry. Results The expression of TF on the surface of circulating monocytes was significantly higher in patients than in healthy subjects (61.9 ± 11.7 % vs 33.7 ± 6.3 %, p<0.0001), mainly explained by a higher expression on classical monocytes (77.7 ± 9.5 vs 58.3 ± 15.8 %, p<0.001). Clotting times were lower in patients than in healthy subjects in basal (407.8 77.7 ± 144.6 sec vs 615.5 ± 123.4 sec p<0.0001) and proinflammatory (222.4 ± 48.2 sec vs 307.8± 82.4 sec p=0.003) conditions. A 6-month PA intervention did not induce any modulation of the monocyte phenotype or coagulation parameters of patients with atherosclerosis. Conclusion Asymptomatic patients with carotid atherosclerosis have a higher proinflammatory and procoagulant profile, suggesting a higher thromboembolic risk. However, home-based PA intervention did not improve their profiles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Josset et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis. Individualized physical activity (PA) intervention vs. Control group was evaluated on Monocyte phenotype (tissue factor expression) and coagulation parameters. Patients with carotid atherosclerosis had higher monocyte tissue factor expression than healthy subjects (61.9% vs 33.7%, p<0.0001), and a 6-month physical activity intervention did not improve this.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: