Key result
Over a 26-year period, a professional football franchise experienced a significant decline in major injuries (rs = -0.68; P<0.01), with no difference in injury rates between grass and artificial turf.
Why the study?
Injury rates and severity trends over time in professional football, including the impact of playing surface, were unclear and needed longitudinal evaluation.
Does playing on artificial turf compared to grass affect the rate of significant or major injuries in professional football players?
Observational
No
Does playing on artificial turf compared to grass affect the rate of significant or major injuries in professional football players?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Long-term data from a professional football franchise showed a decline in major injuries over 26 years, with no significant difference in injury rates between grass and artificial turf.
A professional football franchise was studied consecutively from 1960 through 1985 for injuries incurred during regular-season games. A "significant" injury was defined as one requiring the player to miss at least two consecutive games (N = 331) and a "major" injury as one that caused the player to miss at least eight games or the equivalent time (N = 130). Significant injuries averaged 0.89 per game and major injuries 0.35 per game for the entire 26 years. Following a high injury rate prior to 1965, significant injury rates were episodic. Major injuries declined (rs= —.68;p<.01). Since the team's first games on synthetic surfaces in 1968, there was no difference in the rates of significant injuries per game (0.57 vs 0.67) or major injuries per game (0.22 vs 0.33) between games played on grass or artificial turf, respectively. Since 1969 there has been a decline in major knee injuries (rs= —.51;P<.05) and a decline in major injuries incurred during special-teams play (rs= —.55;P<.05). The data indicate that this team suffered fewer injuries with the passing of time, primarily in injuries that caused a player to miss at least eight consecutive games. Observations of short duration do not lend themselves to current media perception that injury rates are higher and more serious today in professional football. (JAMA1988;260:939-944)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James A. Nicholas (1988) conducted an observational in Professional football injuries. Passing of time (1960-1985) vs. Earlier years was evaluated on Major injuries (missing at least eight games) (rs = -0.68, p=<.01). Over a 26-year period, a professional football franchise experienced a significant decline in major injuries (rs = -0.68; P<0.01), with no difference in injury rates between grass and artificial turf.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: