Structurally flexible (1R,2R)-cyclohexanediammonium (CHDA(2+)) dication formed hydrogen-bonding supramolecules with [18]crown-6, benzo[18]crown-6 (B[18]crown-6), dibenzo[18]crown-6 (DB[18]crown-6), and dicyclohexano[18]crown-6 (DCH[18]crown-6) in [Ni(dmit)(2)](-) salts (dmit(2-) = 2-thioxo-1,3-dithiole-4,5-dithiolate). The two ammonium moieties of CHDA(2+) interacted with the crown ethers to form open-mouth-shaped sandwich-type cationic structures of (CHDA(2+))(crown ethers)(2), that is, (CHDA(2+))([18]crown-6)(2)[Ni(dmit)(2)](2)(-)() (1), (CHDA(2+))(B[18]crown-6)(2)[Ni(dmit)(2)](2)(-)() (2), (CHDA(2+))(DB[18]crown-6)(2)[Ni(dmit)(2)](2)(-)() (3), and (CHDA(2+))(DCH[18]crown-6)(2)[Ni(dmit)(2)](2)(-)() (4). The chiral structure of CHDA(2+) induced asymmetrical [Ni(dmit)(2)](-) arrangements in the crystals. A large frequency and temperature dependence of the dielectric response was observed in (CHDA(2+))(B[18]crown-6)(2), due to the pendulum motion of the cyclohexane ring along the nitrogen-nitrogen direction of CHDA(2+). Since the inversion center of the [Ni(dmit)(2)](-) arrangements was lost in the unit cell due to the chiral space group, the salts 1-4 showed rather complicated magnetic behaviors. The temperature-dependent magnetic properties of salts 3 and 4 were explained by the sum of the Curie-Weiss and singlet-triplet thermal excitation models, with positive (ferromagnetic) and negative (antiferromagnetic) magnetic exchange energies, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ye et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: