Key result
Portable dipyridamole-stress SAECG identifies CAD with ~83% sensitivity via filtered QRS duration changes.
Why the study?
Portable-type signal-averaged electrocardiography with dipyridamole stress was previously found retrospectively to identify CAD patients with high sensitivity and specificity, warranting prospective investigation.
Does portable-type signal-averaged electrocardiography with dipyridamole stress accurately detect coronary artery disease in patients with chest pain?
Observational (n=71)
No
Does portable-type signal-averaged electrocardiography with dipyridamole stress accurately detect coronary artery disease in patients with chest pain?
Dipyridamole-stress portable SAECG is a useful bedside tool for detecting coronary artery disease with high sensitivity and specificity.
Hypothesis-generating for portable dipyridamole-stress SAECG in CAD detection; prospective validation required before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: In a retrospective study portable-type signal-averaged electrocardiography (SAECG) with dipyridamole stress was found to identify patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) at their bedside with high sensitivity and specificity, so the utility of this method was prospectively investigated in the present study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Standard 12-lead QRS wave SAECG was performed before and after dipyridamole stress at the bedside in 71 patients with chest pain (43 males, mean age 63 +/-9 years). The filtered QRS duration (fQRSd) before and after dipyridamole stress was determined by multiphasic oscillation method for each of the standard 12 leads, and the maximal value of changes in fQRSd (MAX DeltafQRSd) among the 12 leads was determined. The positive test was defined as MAX DeltafQRSd >or=5 ms, and negative as MAX DeltafQRSd <5 ms based on the previous study. Selective coronary arteriography was performed next. In the positive group (n=31), 25 patients had significant stenosis of the coronary artery and 6 did not. In the negative group (n=40), 5 patients had significant stenosis and 35 did not. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive accuracy and negative predictive accuracy for CAD detection by SAECG was 83%, 85%, 81% and 88%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Dipyridamole-stress portable SAECG is useful for detecting CAD at the patient's bedside with high sensitivity and specificity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Otsubo et al. (2006) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=71). Portable dipyridamole-stress signal-averaged electrocardiography vs. Coronary arteriography was evaluated on Detection of significant coronary artery disease (≥75% stenosis) defined as a maximal change in filtered QRS duration (MAX ∆fQRSd) ≥5 ms. Portable dipyridamole-stress signal-averaged electrocardiography detected coronary artery disease with 83% sensitivity and 85% specificity using a maximal change in filtered QRS duration of ≥5 ms.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: