This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Introduction Patients with localized PDAC have high recurrence rates even after curative-intent therapies. Detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) can inform prognosis and may be therapeutically actionable. Tumor-informed circulating tumor (ct)DNA has been shown to be useful for MRD detection in other cancers, but its utility in localized PDAC patients undergoing curative-intent therapy is not well established. Methods ctDNA samples (total 106) from 32 patients, following completion of all curative-intent therapy, were subjected to Signatera™ analysis (Natera, Inc.). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) data was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Data from three previously presented studies using the same platform were pooled for validation. Results In our cohort (n = 32), ctDNA positivity rate was 28.1 % (9/32) with a median follow-up time of 17.7 months (range 4–62). Median RFS was significantly lower in patients with positive ctDNA (3.6 vs. 29.0 months, p < 0.001; HR: 72.1 [8.6—604.9]). Correlation of positive ctDNA with radiographic recurrence showed a sensitivity of 47.4 % (9/19), specificity of 100 % (13/13), PPV of 100 % (9/9), and NPV of 56.5 % (13/23). In the pooled cohort (n = 172), sensitivity was 66.7 % (50/75), specificity 77.3 % (75/97), PPV 69.4 % (50/72), and NPV 75.0 % (75/100). Conclusions Positive tumor-informed ctDNA test shows a high specificity and PPV for radiographic recurrence and is associated with significantly worse RFS. However, sensitivity of the test remains low. Synopsis In patients with localized PDAC completing curative-intent therapies, tumor-informed ctDNA assessment shows high specificity for radiographic recurrence and is associated with worse RFS. However, sensitivity remains low and presents an opportunity for improved calibration of this platform.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dickey et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: