Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The diverse characteristics among closely related species are often involved in communication between the sexes. The traditional view that intersexual communication behaviors evolve in a complementary way is called into question by the sensory exploitation hypothesis. By predicting a lack of coordinated evolution between signals and preferences, the sensory exploitation hypothesis is distinct from other mechanisms of sexual selection. Tests of sensory exploitation have taken a multi-disciplinary approach, with insights from sensory physiology, behavior and phylogenetic comparisons. By demonstrating that signals and receivers are not closely coupled, and that signal preference pre-dates signal origin, proponents of the model argue that sensory exploitation is an evolutionary force responsible for the diversification of intersexual communication signals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kerry L. Shaw (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: