Key result
Replacing saturated fat with omega-6 linoleic acid increases all-cause mortality ~62% in men with CHD.
Why the study?
Clinical coronary heart disease benefits of omega-6 linoleic acid replacing saturated fat have not been established, and a complete analysis of its effects on CHD and CVD mortality was previously not possible due to missing data from the Sydney Diet Heart Study.
Does replacing saturated fat with omega-6 linoleic acid reduce mortality in men with coronary heart disease?
RCT (n=458)
Does replacing saturated fat with omega-6 linoleic acid reduce mortality in men with coronary heart disease?
Substituting saturated fat with omega-6 linoleic acid from safflower oil increased all-cause, cardiovascular, and coronary heart disease mortality in men with CHD.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Challenges substitution of saturated fat with omega-6 linoleic acid in men with CHD; contradicts prior dietary guidelines and supports reevaluation in trials.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of replacing saturated fat (SFA) with omega‐6 linoleic acid (LA) for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD) and death. Background Advice to substitute polyunsaturated fats (PUFAs) for SFA is a cornerstone of dietary guidelines. However, clinical CHD benefits of the most abundant PUFA, omega‐6 LA have not been established. A complete analysis of the effects of LA on CHD and CVD mortality has not previously been possible due to missing data from the Sydney Diet Heart Study (SDHS). We recovered the original SDHS dataset to fill two key evidence gaps by (1) reporting unpublished CHD and CVD mortality outcomes, and (2) updating our incomplete 2010 meta‐analysis of LA intervention trials. Design Randomised controlled trial in 458 men with CHD. Interventions The intervention group replaced SFA with LA from safflower oil and safflower oil polyunsaturated margarine. The control group continued their habitual diet. Results The intervention group had higher all‐cause (HR 1.62; 95%CI 1.00–2.64; p=0.051), CVD (HR 1.70; 95%CI 1.03–2.80; p=0.037) and CHD mortality (HR 1.74; 95%CI 1.04–2.92; p=0.036). An updated meta‐analysis of LA intervention trials showed concordant unfavorable effects for CHD and CVD death. Conclusions Substituting LA in place of SFA increased all‐cause, CVD and CHD mortality. Advice to increase LA or unspecified PUFAs merits reconsideration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramsden et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in Coronary heart disease (n=458). Omega-6 linoleic acid (LA) vs. Habitual diet was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.00-2.64, p=0.051). Replacing saturated fat with omega-6 linoleic acid increased all-cause mortality (HR 1.62; 95% CI 1.00-2.64; p=0.051) in men with coronary heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: