Key result
A model using papillary muscle angle and LV length predicts normal QRS duration within ~1 ms.
Why the study?
Large interindividual variability of normal QRS duration exists, necessitating a model to predict case-specific normal QRS duration for assessing heart disease progression.
Does a prediction model using MRI-derived left ventricular morphology accurately predict normal QRS duration in healthy adult volunteers?
Observational (n=93)
Does a prediction model using MRI-derived left ventricular morphology accurately predict normal QRS duration in healthy adult volunteers?
Left ventricular morphological parameters (length and papillary muscle angle) derived from MRI can accurately predict case-specific normal QRS duration, outperforming LV mass.
BACKGROUND: The knowledge of the case-specific normal QRS duration in each individual is needed when determining the onset, severity and progression of the heart disease. However, large interindividual variability even of the normal QRS duration exists. The aims of the study were to develop a model for prediction of normal QRS complex duration and to test it on healthy individuals. METHODS: The study population of healthy adult volunteers was divided into a sample for development of a prediction model (n = 63) and a testing sample (n = 30). Magnetic resonance imaging data were used to assess anatomical characteristics of the left ventricle: the angle between papillary muscles (PM(A)), the length of the left ventricle (LV(L)) and left ventricular mass (LV(M)). Twelve-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was used for measurement of the QRS duration. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to develop a prediction model to estimate the QRS duration. The accuracy of the prediction model was assessed by comparing predicted with measured QRS duration in the test set. RESULTS: The angle between PM(A) and the length of the LV(L) were statistically significant predictors of QRS duration. Correlation between QRS duration and PM(A) and LV(L) was r = 0.57, P = 0.0001 and r = 0.45, P = 0.0002, respectively. The final model for prediction of the QRS was: QRS(Predicted)= 97 + (0.35 x LV(L)) - (0.45 x PM(A)). The predicted and real QRS duration differed with median 1 ms. CONCLUSIONS: The model for prediction of QRS duration opens the ability to predict case-specific normal QRS duration. This knowledge can have clinical importance, when determining the normality on case-specific basis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hakacova et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=93). Left ventricular morphological characteristics (angle between papillary muscles and length of left ventricle) was evaluated on Prediction of QRS duration. A model incorporating the angle between papillary muscles and left ventricular length accurately predicted case-specific normal QRS duration, with a median difference of 1 ms from measured values.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: