Objective: To determine if increasing positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) leads to a change in cardiac index in children with Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ranging from mild to severe. Design: Prospective interventional study. Setting: Multidisciplinary Pediatric Intensive Care Unit in a University teaching hospital. Patients: 15 intubated children (5 females, 10 males) with a median age of 72 months (IQR 4, 144) and a median weight of 19.3 kg (IQR 7.3, 57.1) with a severity of Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome that ranged from mild to severe with a median lung injury score of 2.3 (IQR 2.0, 2.7). Measurements: Cardiac index (CI) and stroke volume (SV) were measured on baseline ventilator settings and subsequently with a PEEP 4 cmH2O higher than baseline. Change in CI and SV from baseline values was evaluated using Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: A total of 19 paired measurements obtained. The median baseline PEEP was 8 cmH2O (IQR 7, 10) Range 6 – 14 cmH2O. There was no significant change in cardiac index or stroke volume with change in PEEP. Baseline median CI 4.4 L/min/m2 (IQR 3.0, 4.9) and PEEP 4 higher median CI of 4.3 L/min/m2 (IQR 3.5, 4.9), p = 0.53. Baseline median SV 26 ml (IQR 10, 53) and at PEEP 4 higher median SV 34 ml (IQR 10, 48) p = 0.59. Conclusion: There is no significant change in cardiac index or stroke volume with increasing PEEP by 4cm H2O in a population of children with mild to severe PARDS. Keywords: positive end-expiratory pressure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, mechanical ventilation. Abbreviations: CaO2 = Arterial oxygen content CO = Cardiac output CI = Cardiac Index DO2 = Oxygen delivery LIS = Lung Injury Score PARDS = Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Abstract word count 249 Total word count 2091
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Virk et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: